Jan 19, 2009  Up Idol 2 Fei Yu-ching Footage【湖南卫视官方超清版】 - Duration: 25:31. 湖南卫视芒果TV官方频道 China HunanTV Official Channel 2,269,792 views 25:31. That tape surely went out with the VCR, but some distribution company thought it. That's that Soviet era efficiency for ya and why the Russkies got into space first! So, that's 31/60, or an average of 5.167 out of 10, which I'll round down to 5. Director: Nitesh Tiwari Stars: Aamir Khan, Sakshi Tanwar, Fatima Sana.

We decided to take a break from the springing forth in Minneapolis to hit yet another field where fact and fabrication have been scarily intertwined: autism and vaccines. The anti-vax celebrity movement is going strong—now they can to their ranks—and more parents are jumping on the “. Meanwhile, the U.S. Is already, while and the U.K. All while the actual research that there is absolutely no link between vaccines and autism,, colitis, asthma, teenage pregnancy, incurable foot odor, etc.

A stock anti-vax response to these facts? “So what??” Well, doctors, that’s who. As, the anti-vax movement isn’t just leaving an isolated number of unvaccinated children vulnerable—it’s putting entire regions in danger: “When more than 10 percent of a community opts out of vaccinations, it leaves the entire community at risk because germs have a greater chance of causing an epidemic,” said Dr. Ari Brown, an Austin, Texas, pediatrician who represents the American Academy of Pediatrics. The issue at hand is “herd immunity,” which works as a buffer: If enough people in a community are vaccinated, they protect those with weaker immune systems, or those whose vaccinations didn’t take, from catching the disease.

The CDC estimates that some diseases, like mumps, can’t generally take hold in a population where as few as 75 percent of the people are vaccinated. But other, more virulent diseases, such as measles or the whooping cough, need collective immunity of up to 94 percent to avoid infection. So, in essence: Sure, your unvaccinated kid may live through the measles, or the mumps (though, as, cases in Canada have led to hospitalizations, deafness, meningitis, and sterility). But he’s also putting the other kids at risk. As for the argument that children may suffer to vaccines?

That one may soon kick the bucket entirely, now that a team of experts that with close monitoring and a few standard precautions, almost all children with known or suspected vaccine allergies (as determined by a pre-shots allergy test) can be safely immunized. One more reason to. Is it reasonable to assume that natural selection weeds out autism (and allergies) from the population?

That would be a big YES, autistic individuals are at a distinct reproductive disadvantage. Is it reasonable to hold the premise that the incidence of autism has substantially increased over the past 30 years, YES. And is it therefore reasonable to assume some new environmental variable has been introduced within the past 30 years that is a primary cause for autism, YES.

Blank formi plan proizvodstvenno finansovoj deyateljnosti seljskohozyajstvennogo. Are multiple vaccines one of many new variables introduced to the environment within the past 30 years, YES. Is it reasonable to assume there is a correlation between vaccines and rates of autism, YES.

Has causative link been found, NO. Has the CDC, NIH, APA, etc ever conducted a study that comprehensively compares unvaccinated children with full schedule vaccinated children, NO. Would such a study at least be helpful in understanding the perimeters of the correlation, YES. Given all this is it unreasonable to see why some parents seek to reduce the number of variables that may cause autism and thus the risk? More radical in thinking, is autism as bad an out come as death? Does autism not rob a person of some of the most fundamental aspects of being human? Given that, is the motivation to reduce the number of possible causative variables of autism unreasonable or foolish?